Home | | E-Mail | | Contents | | V&FT


The Christmas Conspiracy


PRETERISM AND "ORTHODOXY"
Gary North v. David Chilton

Subj:    [SGP] Gary North on David Chilton before Chilton died
Date:    98-11-22 15:31:50 EST
From:    kingdom@ksinc.net (Ward Fenley)
Sender:    SGPlist-owner@preterist.com

Just thought you all might be interested in this. I personally had not actually seen the quote, but now I have.

Gary North's response to Chilton's views:

As the publisher of Days of Vengeance and Paradise Restored, let me say, without hesitation, that the post-1994 David Chilton is indeed a heretic who has denied the Church's historic creeds and confessions on the question of the Second Coming of Christ and the Final Judgment.

It is always sad when a defender of the faith abandons orthodoxy on any point. When he abandons it on the very point on which he had made his intellectual reputation, it is double sad. In Chilton's case, it is pathetic, for no matter what he writes on this topic from now on, his critics will be able to say, justifiably: "His heart attack disrupted his ability to think clearly. It distorted his judgment."

From his public outburst against Vern Crisler -- for which he later repented, admitting that he cannot think straight these days -- until this self-burial of his pre-1994 writings, David Chilton has gone off the deep end. He has now become self-damaged goods delivered on the doorstep of Max King.

ICE will continue to publish Productive Christians in an Age of Guilt Manipulators and The Great Tribulation. Dominion Press will continue to publish Days of Vengeance and Paradise Restored. I am happy with the existing editions of all of these books. They will not be revised for as long as these two publishers continue to publish these four books. For as long as there is money to plow back into publishing them, they will appear just as they are today. It is sad when a publisher must defend fine books against their author, but such is the case. I bought orthodoxy. I will not relinquish it in order to turn it over to a man who has literally lost his mind -- the mind of Christ.

I would suggest that we not encourage his heresy by interacting with him on this matter on this or any other forum. It is now a matter of Church discipline, assuming that he is under any.

I plan to hire Ken Gentry to write a refutation of heretical preterism. We should respond to these ideas, but not to Chilton personally. He is crippled now, and I do not think it is fair to beat him up in public. It is also unlikely to change what is left of his mind.

We can and should pray for the restoration of his mind, but to debate with him publicly will almost certainly drive him deeper into this heresy. He will feel compelled to defend himself in public. Let him go in peace. It is not our God-given task to confront him at this point. That is for his local church to do. It is not as though he were some unknown church member who has stumbled into this heresy unknowingly. He is self-conscious, to the extent of a victim of a massive, brain-affecting heart attack can be self-conscious. He is not the man we used to know, as he has admitted here. That man died in 1994, he says. I agree. So, let us say now, David Chilton, RIP.

Gary North
end of North response:

Vern Crisler adds...

Sadly, Chilton died shortly thereafter, not having provided us with any indication that he had converted back to orthodoxy.


Ward Fenley comments:
May more leaders like Chilton lose "their" minds. Kind of an interesting parallel to Nebuchadnezzar.


Subj:    Re: [SGP] Gary North on David Chilton before Chilton died
Date:    98-11-23 02:53:35 EST
From:    bmax@ulink.net (Brian Maxwell)


So what is Vern saying? "it's too bad that Chilton did not repent of this sin before he died" Does this man think that Chilton was not in the Kingdom?

What else should we expect from a self righteous Pharisee.......?
Aparently, orthodoxy is what saves in the circle of Rushdoonyism.....

I met David Chilton in 1996 before I became full preterist. He was a good friend of someone that I had just started going to church with. He gave me no indication that he had lost any of his mental capacities. People just thought he was nuts for believing that Christ might have already come in Ad70. And his heart attack was just a way of sweeping his views under the rug so no one would take him seriously. David died about 6 months after I met him, but I never really knew who he was until I became a full preterist just over a year ago. It's really too bad that these "Christian men" should speak of David in this way.

I am really sorry for calling people like Vern and Gary North "Pharisees", but time and time again, they fit the mold perfect. Self-righteous, and condemning true believers in Jesus Christ.

Just my thoughts........

In Heaven,

Brian

................................................
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to listserv@preterist.com with the words: "unsubscribe sgplist" in the body of the message. Administrator is SGPList-Owner@preterist.com. This is an unmoderated list, so say whatever you want but don't blame it on us. List services courtesy of Cire Services.
***All Rights Reserved***


Subj: Just one more claptrap heresy
Date: 98-11-18 15:54:59 EST
From: a-garymc@microsoft.com (Gary McGinnis (Wasser))
To: kevin4vft@aol.com ('kevin4vft@aol.com')

You say "it's better to be attacked than ignored." Consider yourself
ignored. Repent and believe the Gospel. You are outside the Faith.


----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
Return-Path: <a-garymc@microsoft.com
Received: from  rly-zb03.mx.aol.com (rly-zb03.mail.aol.com [172.31.41.3]) by
air-zb05.mail.aol.com (v51.28) with SMTP; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 15:54:59 -0500
Received: from mail3.microsoft.com (mail3.microsoft.com [131.107.3.123])
  by rly-zb03.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0)
  with ESMTP id PAA26701 for <kevin4vft@aol.com;
  Wed, 18 Nov 1998 15:54:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail3.microsoft.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9)
id ; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 12:54:58 -0800
From: "Gary McGinnis (Wasser)" <a-garymc@microsoft.com
To: "'kevin4vft@aol.com'" <kevin4vft@aol.com
Subject: Just one more claptrap heresy
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 12:54:51 -0800
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9)

 

Subj: RE: Just one more claptrap heresy
Date: 98-11-18 17:37:35 EST
From: a-garymc@microsoft.com (Gary McGinnis (Wasser))
To: KEVIN4VFT@aol.com ('KEVIN4VFT@aol.com')

In denying the Second Coming, you deny the Faith.
Your assertion that extreme preterism is a "truth"
missed by the Church until now is ridiculous.
It deserves nothing but contempt,
which you will receive upon the very event
you so heinously deny.


My response to Mr. McGinnis


I met David Chilton, author of Days of Vengeance (a commentary on the Book of Revelation), The Great Tribulation, and Paradise Restored (an introduction to preterist eschatology)  in 1977 or 1978, while he was attending classes at Reformed Theological Seminary in Jackson, MS. We became very good friends, and I shared the pulpit with him at Reformation Bible Church in Anaheim, CA. As a Chalcedon Scholar, I joined David on occasion as a kind of substitute for R.J. Rushdoony at Rush's weekly services in Westwood, CA. We worked together on the writing of books and newsletter articles. The 1st edition of his book Productive Christians In An Age Of Guilt Manipulators evidences our friendship in the Acknowledgments and in the text.

There seems to be an unwritten rule that Reconstructionist relationships must never last more than 6 years. Our relationship was no exception. David joined the "Tyler" reconstructionists with their liturgical high-church doctrines, and I was moving toward my own Vine & Fig Tree ideas of decentralization.

Before he became a consistent preterist (or, as Gary North puts it, a "heretic"), David concluded that there were no verses in the Bible which taught a future (to us) coming of Christ, in which Christ would bodily return to this planet. Nevertheless, he continued to believe this, the "orthodox"  doctrine of the "Second Coming," because it had been taught for nearly 2000 years by "Holy Mother the Church" (Chilton's words).

After his heart attack, he apparently abandoned the doctrine that the institutional church has priority over the Scriptures.

North's analysis of Chilton is disturbing on a personal and a theological level. On a personal level, it indicates that Dr. North (and others who have criticized Chilton for his "outbursts" or other "irrational" behavior) never really knew David as a person. Reconstructionists treat each other as commodities (see North's remark, "I bought orthodoxy," or his characterization of Chilton as "the 'hottest theological property' in the West." ["Publisher's Epilogue," Paradise Restored, ppbk ed., p.334n7]) Any non-economist who knew David Chilton knew that he was a person with transparent emotions. To those who kept their feelings under wraps, David appeared melodramatic and irrational. He was full of song and joy, or mourning and lamentation. His "outburst" against Vern Crisler was simply the typically zealous fire of Chiltonasius contra mundum (although it is true that as a result of his heart attack and coma, he momentarily forgot who Crisler was, and his zeal was misdirected). Chilton's vigorous personality and open emotions are now being used to dismiss his paradigm-shifting theological conclusions. Those who argue in this way are likely either deceptive or ignorant of David's life-long personality.

On a theological level, North is equally disturbing.

What is "Orthodoxy?"

Who is more orthodox, the person who clearly misinterprets 99 out of 100 passages but could possibly be right on one, or the person who possibly misinterprets only 1 out of 100, but unarguably gets the other 99 right? Let me be more specific.

Let's say that there are 100 total verses on prophecy which have been used throughout church history to support the doctrine of the Second Coming. Verses such as Matthew 24:30:

Then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.

Many Reconstructionists can remember the first time they read Rushdoony, who relied on the work of J. Marcellus Kik, who showed with clear and convincing passages of Scripture that Matthew 24:30 was talking about events in A.D.70, not a future Second Coming. It was a "paradigm shift." Living in the vicinity of Chuck Smith's Calvary Chapel in Costa Mesa, I remember how this way of seeing put us at odds with most Bible-believing Christians in Orange County (and I think Chilton and I both relished the idea of being at odds with the reigning "orthodoxy"). What I didn't realize then was that it also put us at odds with the Westminster Divines, who erred on this point. Their basic hermeneutical approach is erroneous. The Westminster Standards apparently lack even the most elementary understanding of preterism (the belief that Matthew 24 and other passages are already fulfilled). Whatever you believe about Matthew 24:36ff., you should know by now that Matthew 24:30 is talking about Jesus' Coming in judgment against covenant-breaking Israel. All Reconstructionists and virtually all Reformed writers agree on this. This is now (in the late 20th century) Eschatology 101. The Westminster Standards — and thus "orthodoxy" itself — are in fundamental hermeneutical error on these points (see Larger Catechism, Q 56).

I submit that if there are 100 such verses, "orthodoxy" errs on 99 of them, because of this need for a "paradigm shift." There is one verse (I am granting this for the sake of argument) which could possibly refer to a non-A.D.70 coming, but could also apply to the events in A.D.70. This verse is the last resort of modern (esp. Reconstructionist) "orthodoxy" in its defense of the "Second Coming." Even though Chilton is right on 99% of those verses, and even though "orthodoxy" is wrong on 99%, because David Chilton disagrees with the "orthodox" interpretation of that one verse he is burned in Effigy (a quiet suburb outside Tyler).

We are facing a wonderful and dramatic opportunity to prune back dead branches of "orthodoxy" and revive the Church with the pure teachings of Scripture. In order to be successful, we cannot make the shift in only one area (e.g., eschatology), but must make the same shift in thought that David Chilton did. No longer can we say "I believe because Holy Mother the Church teaches." No longer can we say "I act because Big Brother the State commands." We must take our marching orders from Christ.

The Paradigm Shift begins here.