A political doctrine claiming that monarchy
was a divinely ordained institution in which kings and queens were
answerable only to God. It therefore followed that it was a sin for
the subjects of even the most evil or incompetent monarchs to
disobey them. The doctrine evolved in the middle ages, partly as a
reaction to interference in the affairs of a nation by the pope and
partly to strengthen the hand of monarchs in their dealings with
parliaments. In its practical, rather than its mystical, aspects the
doctrine can therefore be seen as an early form of the idea of
national sovereignty and as an attempt to form a strong centralized
executive.
In England, divine right was ardently espoused by James
I, not only in his writings and his speeches but also in
his dealings with Parliament. The alienation of Parliament became
complete when his successor, Charles
I, used divine right as a pretext for levying illegal
taxes. Although Charles's appointee Archbishop Laud
preached that "the king could never depart from God's service,"
Parliament finally demanded his execution. From the scaffold the
doomed king continued to maintain that the people's freedom
"consisted in the enjoyment of laws by which their life and liberty
would be secure" rather than by sharing in government. In practice
the divine right of kings in England died with Charles I, although
the theory was revived after the Restoration. Following the
deposition of James II in the Glorious
Revolution, the theory itself became untenable, and most
political thinkers justified the status quo by reference to some
form of social-contract
philosophy, in which authority derives from the (supposed) consent
of the governed, rather than the will of God.
In France, the divine right persisted throughout Louis
XIV's reign and in a less pronounced form until the
Revolution of 1789. After the Revolutionary and Napoleonic period
the theory was revived by conservative thinkers to justify the
restoration of hereditary rulers throughout Europe. However, most of
the restored monarchies were reduced to constitutional status by the
mid-19th century. Only in Russia did an active belief in divine
right survive (until the Revolutions of 1918).
In the UK the legacy of divine right survives not only in the
religious nature of the coronation service and the mystique that
surrounds hereditary constitutional monarchs but also in the
doctrine that Parliament is sovereign--i.e. that the Crown, acting
in Parliament, cannot be challenged by any other entity (such as the
courts or a written constitution).