Americans!
It's time to STAND UP and
"WASTE" your vote!!
When I say "Americans" I'm
not talking to Liberals.
I'm talking to those of you who voted "for" George
Dubya because you wanted to vote against Al
Gore.
- You believed that if you voted
for a candidate who
- • truly stands for the
principles of the Constitution
• who truly opposes the New World Order
• who acts on principle
• not for points in political polls
• or kickbacks from special
interests,
- you will be "wasting"
your vote because your candidate will not be the
"winner."
- You voted "for" Dubya because
you believed him to be dedicated to the principles our Founding
Fathers fought and died for, a man passionately committed to
advancing a truly conservative agenda, heroically swimming against a
tide of liberalism and globalism, carrying a wounded nation safely
to the rock of moral absolutes and liberty
under God.
- You voted "for" Dubya because
you were afraid that Al Gore
would carry us to a New World Order of international
socialism even faster than George W.
Bush will.
And let's make no mistake about it: George Dubya WILL
get us there. A vote for a Bush regime is a vote for the
New World Order -- eventually. Like
father, like son.
But here's the surprise:
The George W. Bush Administration has advanced
liberalism and globalism
FASTER and FURTHER
than an Al Gore Administration
could have even dreamed.
The proof for this surprising claim is obvious when you
think about it. The links are on this page. More than that, you'll see
that voting for the candidate you really want
to see become President (even if you are certain he won't win in
November) will change your life.
Please -- follow these links.
Your future depends on it.
- The "Conservative" Nixon did more to advance
liberalism and socialism than Humphrey ever could have.
- Gary Allen: Nixon: The Man Behind the
Mask, Chapter 1.
-
- If you want to advance liberalism, vote Republican; if
you want to advance conservatism, vote Democratic
- Thomas Gale Moore, Hoover Institution (link coming soon! - temporary
link)
-
- George Bush: The
Establishment's Man
- James Drummey on President G.H.W. Bush
-
- Gary North: The Lesser of Two Evils Rarely Is
- The "greater" of two evils probably can't build the coalitions necessary to get anything done at all.
Additional Links of Interest
HISTORY
Those who will not learn from the past are
doomed to repeat it.
If you want to energize grass-roots conservative action and see pressure
put on government, the best that could happen would be the election of
Hillary Clinton to President.
Of course, the Republican Leadership would oppose conservative action, just
as they did during the impeachment proceedings against Mr. Hillary.
This is why we must
question the very mythology of the Republican-Democrat,
"Left"-"Right" distinction.
The LONE ARGUMENT
against voting for a man of principle
It's the only argument floating around that hasn't been directly answered
in the links above. If we elect Bush, at least he won't appoint liberals to
the federal courts. If we elect Bush he will put at least one conservative
on the Supreme Court
Oh yeah?!?
Has your good sense been
BORKED?!?
Once you've become familiar with the history chronicled in the links
above, this scenario will be self-evident rather than prophetic.
|
President Dubya will nominate for his first Supreme
Court Justice a man of dedicated conservative principles who takes a
hard pro-life stand. He would vote to overturn Roe v. Wade.
This inclination will become a great controversy,
and the Senate will vote against
confirming him.
BORK!
goes Bush's nominee!
Just as the Senate -- controlled
by the Republican Establishment -- voted AGAINST
convicting Bill Clinton!
REMEMBER?
Is it all coming
back to you now?
President Bush then nominates another David Souter.
This nominee is the same person
that Al Gore would
have nominated the first time around, and the
"moderate," "centrist" nominee is quickly
confirmed. Millions of people who voted for Bush say nothing, and
only those who voted for a man of principle write to their Senator
criticizing the politics of BORK! |
- "Even assuming George W. cares about judicial restraint, his
election probably will have zero impact on the Court's
anti-Constitutional drift."
The President is in many ways a puppet, a figurehead. Any American who
feels he has discharged his civic obligations by voting for a puppet every
four years needs to take a civics class (but not in a government-run
school). More important are the elections every 2 years for Congress, and
more important still are acts of letter-writing every month to Congressmen,
and especially to bureaucrats when they open the
door to public opinion before passing dictatorial regulations. A
letter or phone call is viewed as carrying the weight of six
times as many voters.
- If you vote for George W. Bush, and he wins, you'll
be inclined to think you've "won." You'll slack off
for the next four years. When Bush pushes us further into the New World
Order, you'll be silent, because you voted for him.
- If you vote for a candidate of principle, you know
you'll have to be vigilant. You will be dedicated for the next
four years. You'll be on your guard against both Bush and
Gore. Voting for a "loser"
will change your life.
If you vote for Bush, what
"message" are you sending? That you support the
Republican Establishment? That you don't
support "extremism" and radical Constitutional principles? On the
day after the election, should it turn out that your principled,
"extremist" candidate got 23% of the votes, could
a stronger "message" be imagined? Every vote you cast for your man
of principle counts for 2 or 3 votes for The
Establishment's Man. Votes for a man of principle send shivvers down the
spine of the New World Order.
America!
It's time to STAND UP and
"WASTE" your vote!!
|