Doctrine of the two kingdoms

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 
Martin Luther's doctrine of the two kingdoms (or two reigns) of God teaches that God is the ruler of the whole world and that he rules in two ways.  
He rules the earthly or left-hand kingdom through secular (and, though this point is often misunderstood, also churchly) government, by means of law (i.e., the sword or compulsion) and in the heavenly or right-hand kingdom (his spiritual kingdom, that is, Christians insofar as they are a new creation who spontaneously and voluntarily obey) through the gospel or grace.
Example of "one-kingdom" thinking?

Deuteronomy 17:14 “When you come to the land which the LORD your God is giving you, and possess it and dwell in it, and say, ‘I will set a king over me like all the nations that are around me,’ 15 you shall surely set a king over you whom the LORD your God chooses; one from among your brethren you shall set as king over you; you may not set a foreigner over you, who is not your brother. 16 But he shall not multiply horses for himself, nor cause the people to return to Egypt to multiply horses, for the LORD has said to you, ‘You shall not return that way again.’ 17 Neither shall he multiply wives for himself, lest his heart turn away; nor shall he greatly multiply silver and gold for himself.
18 “Also it shall be, when he sits on the throne of his kingdom, that he shall write for himself a copy of this law in a book, from the one before the priests, the Levites. 19 And it shall be with him, and he shall read it all the days of his life, that he may learn to fear the LORD his God and be careful to observe all the words of this law and these statutes, 20 that his heart may not be lifted above his brethren, that he may not turn aside from the commandment to the right hand or to the left, and that he may prolong his days in his kingdom, he and his children in the midst of Israel.

What does it mean to say that "God rules" Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, Rome, Babylon, or Egypt?

This paragraph needs to be stated more accurately:

  • God rules people (Joe the Plumber) in the left-hand kingdom by magistrates armed with the sword.
  • God rules people (Joe the Parishioner) in the right-hand kingdom by pastors armed with grace and no sword.

The question is, how does God govern the governors? What rules govern the use of the sword by the rulers of the left-hand kingdom?

One might infer from this paragraph that "Christians" are governed by grace, and non-Christians are governed by law. Whose law?

But modern two-kingdom advocates (Horton et al) would say that Christians are members of both kingdoms, and when they are in church or relating to the church, they are under grace, but in all other areas of life, they are under the laws of the left-hand kingdom. Again, who makes the laws of the left-hand kingdom? Does God prescribe these laws in the Bible? Modern 2K advocates seem to say no.

Contents

1 On Secular Authority
2 Response and influence
3 In Roman Catholicism
4 References
5 See also
6 External links
 

On Secular Authority

 
Martin Luther's book, On Secular Authority, was an ardent expression of the principle of Liberty of Conscience. “Liberty of conscience” is the principle that forbids human authorities from coercing people’s spiritual beliefs. In this book, Luther insisted that God requires voluntary religious beliefs. Compelled or coerced faith is insincere and must never be allowed. Luther insisted that “liberty of conscience” was one of Jesus Christ’s principles. According to Luther, the civil government’s role is simply to keep outward peace in society. The civil government has no business enforcing spiritual laws. “The laws of worldly government extend no farther than to life and property and what is external upon earth,” Luther insisted. Echoing Luther, writing on religious liberty, Thomas Jefferson stated “The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others.” Jefferson may not have had Luther specifically in mind, but was perhaps an heir to the Protestant tradition which gave birth to this sentiment. Addressing the question of whether the state should permit its citizens to believe religious views which are heterodox, Luther said, “heresy can never be prevented by force... heresy is a spiritual matter which no iron can strike, no fire burn, no water drown.” In other words, it is folly to legislate and enforce religious beliefs. If I believe in "liberty of conscience," do I automatically believe in "The Two Kingdoms" theory?

 

What does the word "keep" mean? Are there any laws or restrictions on the means to this end?
What are "spiritual" laws? Which are "non-spiritual" laws?
"For we know that the law is spiritual" (Romans 7:14).
"that the righteous requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit" (Romans 8:4).
 
Luther’s articulation of the parameters of civil government was a monumental step in the development of the separation of church and state. He argued for a clear distinction between two separate spheres: civil and spiritual. This is known as the Doctrine of the two kingdoms. The civil sphere deals with man’s physical life in society as he interacts with other human beings; in this, man is subject to human governments. The spiritual sphere deals with man’s soul, which is eternal, and which is subject only to God. The Doctrine of the two kingdoms is articulated by Luther in these terms:  
God has ordained the two governments: the spiritual, which by the Holy Spirit under Christ makes Christians and pious people; and the secular, which restrains the unchristian and wicked so that they are obliged to keep the peace outwardly... The laws of worldly government extend no farther than to life and property and what is external upon earth. For over the soul God can and will let no one rule but himself. Therefore, where temporal power presumes to prescribe laws for the soul, it encroaches upon God’s government and only misleads and destroys souls. We desire to make this so clear that every one shall grasp it, and that the princes and bishops may see what fools they are when they seek to coerce the people with their laws and commandments into believing one thing or another. What is the difference between "keep the peace" and "keep the law?"

 

Is the soul uninvolved in or unaffected by acts of shoplifting, assault, child molestation, murder? Is a law against sodomy a temporal or spiritual law? Would "gay-rights" group say that anti-sodomy laws are attempts to "legislate and enforce religious beliefs?" Would the deeply-religious practitioners of superstitions like cannibalism agree that laws against cannibalism are temporal, and not religious? Was the British attempt to eradicate thuggism practiced by worshipers of Kali a spiritual or temporal crusade?

Luther encouraged civil disobedience toward any government which would encroach the line of separation between the civil and the sacred:  
We are to be subject to governmental power and do what it bids, as long as it does not bind our conscience but legislates only concerning outward matters.... But if it invades the spiritual domain and constrains the conscience, over which God only must preside and rule, we should not obey it at all but rather lose our necks. Temporal authority and government extend no further than to matters which are external and corporeal.  

Response and influence

 
James Madison explicitly credited Martin Luther as the theorist who “led the way” in providing the proper distinction between the civil and the ecclesiastical spheres.[1]  
John Calvin echoed Luther's "two kingdoms" teaching in his Institutes of the Christian Religion:  
There are two governments: the one religious, by which the conscience is trained to piety and divine worship; the other civil, by which the individual is instructed in those duties which, as men and citizens, we are bound to perform. To these two forms are commonly given the not inappropriate names of spiritual and temporal jurisdiction, intimating that the former species has reference to the life of the soul, while the latter relates to matters of the present life, not only to food and clothing, but to the enacting of laws which require a man to live among his fellows purely honorably, and modestly. The former has its seat within the soul, the latter only regulates the external conduct. We may call the one the religious, the other the civil kingdom. Now, these two, as we have divided them, are always to be viewed apart from each other. Let us now return to human laws. If they are imposed for the purpose of forming a religious obligation, as if the observance of them was in itself necessary, we say that the restraint thus laid on the conscience is unlawful. Our consciences have not to do with men but with God only. Hence the common distinction between the earthly forum and the forum of conscience.  
Luther and Calvin's distinction was adopted by John Milton and John Locke. Milton wrote A Treatise of Civil Power. Locke later echoed the "two kingdoms" doctrine:  
There is a twofold society, of which almost all men in the world are members, and from that twofold concernment they have to attain a twofold happiness; viz. That of this world and that of the other: and hence there arises these two following societies, viz. religious and civil.[2]  

In Roman Catholicism

 
The Roman Catholic Church has a very similar doctrine called the doctrine of the two swords, that pre-dates Martin Luther, in the bull Unam Sanctam by pope Boniface. In this bull, Boniface teaches that there is only one Kingdom, the Church, and that the Church controls the spiritual sword, while the temporal sword is controlled by the State, although the temporal sword is hierarchically lower than the spiritual sword, allowing for Church influence in politics and society at large.  

References

 
^ Madison to Schaeffer, 1821  
^ John Locke, On the Difference between Civil and Ecclesiastical Power  

See also

 
Law and Gospel  
Render unto Caesar... for one of the passages this theology was derived from Render Unto Caesar -- R.J. Rushdoony

External links

 
Lutheran Church of Australia: Commission on Social and Bioethical Questions THE TWO 'KINGDOMS' (2001) The Doctrine of "Two Kingdoms" Analyzed
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctrine_of_the_two_kingdoms"
Categories
: Lutheran theology | Christian politics | Separation of church and state
Hidden categories: Articles needing additional references from July 2009 | All articles needing additional references